Most of us have heard the parable of the prodigal son a hundred times. The younger son demands his inheritance early, squanders it on wild living, ends up in a pig field, comes to himself, and returns home rehearsing a repentance speech. The father sees him from a distance, runs to meet him, and throws him a party.
We hear the running as a tender detail. Of course the father runs. He has missed his son. He is overjoyed to see him.
The original hearers gasped. The running is one of the most countercultural moments in the parable, and it carries the gospel before any of the gifts are mentioned.
The dignity of a Middle Eastern patriarch
Middle Eastern Mediterranean culture in the first century was an honor-shame culture. A man’s standing in his village was the most carefully guarded possession he had. The older a man got and the more children he raised and the more cattle he owned, the more dignity attached to his daily movements.
A patriarch in that world walked at a stately pace, with measured gestures and quiet authority. He sat at the head of the table. He gave the blessings. He spoke last. He moved slowly. His robes brushed the ground. He kept his legs covered.
He did not run. Running was for children and slaves and people in panic. A grown man of standing did not run, because to run he would have to hike up the long robe he was wearing, bare his legs, and break the slow, measured movement that signaled his dignity to the village.
Kenneth E. Bailey, who lived for forty years in the Middle East studying the parables in their original cultural setting, points out that in his time in Lebanese and Syrian villages, the older men of the village would still react with visible discomfort at the idea of an elder running in public. The shame was real. The convention was old.
What the boy had coming
Now picture what the prodigal son was walking back into.
He had asked for his inheritance early, which in the cultural context was essentially saying I wish you were dead. He had taken the money and gone to a far country and spent it on wild living. He had ended up feeding pigs, the most defiling job a Jewish boy could imagine. He had wished he could eat the pigs’ food. He had come to himself.
The village he was walking back to was not waiting to forgive him. The village was waiting to enact what was called a qetsatsah ceremony. The qetsatsah was a ritual practiced when a Jewish boy lost the family fortune among Gentiles. The villagers would bring a large clay pot, fill it with burnt nuts and burnt grain, smash it in front of the boy, and declare him cut off from his people. He was no longer a son of the village.
The boy knew it. His rehearsed speech tells you exactly what he expected. He was not coming home to be reinstated. He was coming home to ask for the position of a hired servant. He had given up on being a son. He was trying to negotiate his way back into a paying job in the household. The qetsatsah was the ceremony he was walking toward.
The father saw him a long way off
Luke says the father saw him when he was still a great way off (Luke 15:20). That phrase is doing work. The father has been watching the road. Every day. For who knows how long. He is not in the house going about his business. He is at the gate. He is watching the road.
And when he sees the boy, he runs.
Stop and feel what that meant. The father hikes up his long robe, bares his legs in front of the village, and breaks into a run. The entire village sees him do it. The patriarch of the family, the man whose dignity has held the household together, is racing through the dust like a child.
He is doing something theological in plain sight. The boy is about to walk into the village square and face the qetsatsah. The father runs the road to get there first. He throws his arms around the boy on the road, kisses him (the Greek says repeatedly, with tenderness), and welcomes him before the village can pass its judgment.
And the shame the father takes on himself by running is the shame the boy would have taken if he had walked into the village alone. The father absorbs the disgrace before the boy can be exposed to it. He runs into the public shame on behalf of the son. By the time they walk into the village together, the father has visibly forgiven the boy in front of the whole community, and the village cannot enact the cutting-off ceremony without contradicting the father’s open welcome.
Then the gifts
Only after the running do the gifts come. The best robe, which is the father’s own honor robe, draped on a son returned in rags. The ring, which is signet authority, the right to act in the family name. The sandals, which mark a free son because slaves went barefoot. Full sonship restored in three gestures before the boy can finish his rehearsed speech.
Each of those gifts is meaningful. But the gospel had already been preached in the running. The body of the father had said it before the wardrobe did. The boy had not even reached the house yet, and the welcome had already been declared in front of the watching village.
What this changes about how you hear the parable
We sometimes hear this parable as a story about a wayward son. It is. But the central character is not the son. The central character is the father. Jesus is telling us what God looks like.
God looks like a patriarch who breaks every cultural convention about dignity to reach the returning child first. God looks like a father who takes on himself the public shame the wayward child would have walked into. God looks like a host who interrupts a confession to throw a party for the one who came back.
The body of the father had already preached the gospel. The original hearers gasped at the running before the ring ever got to the finger. Two thousand years later, the picture is still the gospel. The Father runs.
This is part of the Hidden in Plain Sight series.
Leave a Reply